February 29, 2004
Bioethics
Posted by tomo at 11:37 PM in government . | 2 Comments
When the White House waits until late Friday afternoon to make an announcement you know it's not a good thing. This time he was trying to slip it past that he was sacking two members of his Council on Bioethics for not agreeing with his socially conservative agenda and replacing them with people who do. Bush created this council in 2001 to parrot an "objective" or "scientific" view on stem cell research and other related topics. How that's possible by appointing Leon Kass to the head is unknown as he, a conservative Jew in name but more or less a Christian fundamentalist, is a well-known opponent of therapeutic stem cell research, as well as feminism, gay rights, and abortion. His views, which will influence policy in the U.S., which in turn influences policy worldwide, are anything but objective and unbiased, and will lead to millions of people suffering unnecessarily. As Senator Edward Kennedy said in a statement, "The American people deserve the right science, not right wing ideology, on critical issues facing their health."
Read more:
Bush Replaces Members of Bioethics Panel or the more to-the-point
President hit over bioethics panel shift, Ideological moves seen in dismissals.
The Speculist chimes in with some good insights.
Perhaps the prudent thing to do would be to abolish the Bioethics Council.
Comments
|
Nice articles Tomo. In all seriousness, and in spite of all the issues regarding Dubs, the stem cell research issue was the first one that got me wondering why did he make that decision, wouldn't he have scientific advisors? The microbiologists with degrees, and years of study and research, and the ones teaching me, commented on how a lot of leading researchers left the country soon after Dubs made the decision to only allow the 3 existing stem-cell lines for research (which the price to access for research would also surely skyrocket). I guess the confusion came mostly b/c while people not involved in the sciences might think of the stem-cell issue as a religious one (in part to Hollywood), most of the brain-drain scientists were conducting research on how to treat diseases by regeneration of tissue types. Not making clones of themselves. Instead of Hanyang Univerisity in South Korea, could you imagine the breakthroughs for American science, including new jobs and grant money, if we had held the press conference about how a university in the U.S.A. had created the embryonic stem cells that are the next step to regenerating new, healthy tissue in patients? Personally, I don't think Bush thinks that far ahead, and doesn't conceive the notion that Religion can be practiced, upheld, and respected ALONG WITH advancing science technology. I remind you, people thought 'test tube babies' were sacreligious once. Posted by: MicroMan at March 1, 2004 12:48 AM |
|
Yes, plenty of confusion between therapeutic stem cell research and human cloning. The Bush administration seeks to not only ban BOTH in the U.S., they are trying to make the U.N. ban it worldwide. This is completely ridiculous. I am sure Dubya knows the difference, but does not wish to enlighten his religious constituents who currently oppose "cloning". Stem cell research still looks extremely promising for future medical therapies, and definitely would such new technology be a boon for any country who develops it. However, our current stance on the issue is already, as you mentioned, scaring many of the top researchers in the field to countries like the U.K. All in all, Bush has directly pushed medical breakthroughs many years farther into the future, which one can reasonably say causes unnecessary suffering and death. This will cause more unnecessary deaths than the War in Iraq. Posted by: agent1073 at March 3, 2004 12:53 AM |